1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
|
# research
## DS / DSi emulators
wanted features:
- **DS and DSi version emulation (DSi for later)**
DS version of pictochat can still receive images with rainbow drawings, but
doesn't support sending
- **firmware booting**
the phat DS and DS lite's firmware had pictochat built-in instead of as a
standalone app like on the DSi. to launch pictochat, firmware booting must be
possible.
- **local multiplayer network emulation**
required for testing sending and receiving
- **local multiplayer packet capture**
required for reverse engineering the packet format
- **local multiplayer packet injection**
required for testing forged packets
- **open source**
DIY packet injection anyone?
- **linux-compatible**
just a preference
- **debugging (ideally using GDB or similar interface)**
if all else fails, reading and/or injecting packets into memory using a
debugger might be the only option for testing forged packets. a debugger
could also help with reverse engineering the decoding process of a pictochat
packet/message
### [DeSmuME][desmume]
- phat ds only
- no firmware booting
- no local multiplayer emulation
+ open source
+ cross-platform
- no debugger
DeSmuME is focused on high quality/performance emulation for single player
titles, and actively rejects requests for WiFi emulation.
### [melonDS][melonds]
+ ds and (experimental) dsi support
+ firmware booting support
+ local multiplayer emulation
+ allows patched-in or real network packet capture using loopback network
adapter and wireshark
+ loopback network adapter also (probably) allows injecting forged packets
+ open source
+ cross-platform
- no debugger
melonDS is a very new emulator that is still actively being developed. melonDS
is focused on accurate emulation and is the only one on this list with
sufficiently advanced local multiplayer emulation.
### [no$gba][nogba]
+ supports DS and DSi games
+ firmware booting support
- no local multiplayer emulation
- closed source
- windows only
+ very advanced debugger
[toolchaingenericds]: https://bitbucket.org/Coto88/toolchaingenericds/src/master/
[nogba]: https://problemkaputt.de/gba.htm
[melonds]: https://melonds.kuribo64.net/
[desmume]: https://desmume.org/
## MelonDS hacking
source: <https://git.pipeframe.xyz/fork/melonDS>
- melonDS @ Config > Wifi settings "Local multiplayer features do not use the same network protocols as online play"
- comment @ src/Wifi.cpp:46 "multiplayer host TX sequence"
- references to `RFTransfer_Type{2,3}` @ <https://www.problemkaputt.de/gbatek.htm#dswifirfchip>
- nintendo ds ni-fi protocol @ <https://web.archive.org/web/20090202194241/http://masscat.afraid.org/ninds/proto_info.php>
- melonDS emulates actual 802.11b frames
- the protocol does not appear to be encrypted:
![](../assets/ws-no-encrypt.png)
the string `lork` is visible as plain text in the hexdump (offset 0x0056),
which appears to be some kind of 16-bit encoding of the username set on the
emulator used to capture these packets
- The messages are not sent as single packets. The Ni-Fi protocol appears to set
up a constant stream, and messages are sent across multiple frames.
- A full height filled-in message results in 64 packets (with Wireshark filter
`nifi.type.enum == 1 && pictochat && frame[0x1a] == 0x02 && frame.len ==
246`)
- PictoChat does not appear to send messages when you are in a chat room by
yourself, so local multiplayer / Ni-Fi emulation is required for capturing
message content
### Message sizing/cropping
- PictoChat automatically crops messages to the smallest height (at the fixed
intervals shown as notebook lines in the edit field on the bottom screen).
Message content can be on the notebook line itself without causing the
cropping algorithm to 'allocate' more space; the allocation only happens if
any of the pixels on the line *below* the colored line are used. The method
used to crop the messages also ensures that the username label in the top
left does not obstruct or remove any content.
![](../assets/pictochat-msg-height-1-4.png)
![](../assets/pictochat-msg-height-5-draw.png)
- Message content is likely only cropped when displaying
![](../assets/pictochat-msg-crop.png)
![](../assets/pictochat-msg-crop-lork2.png)
The above image was obtained after the following steps:
- Fill in the top row of the message with the black pen, ensuring the entire
notebook line is colored in as well
- Send message (displayed as top message)
- Copy message
- Erase small portion of black area on the right side (displayed as bottom
message)
Notable observations:
- The message content has a 1 pixel border (padding/margin) on all sides
(except the bottom and corners) that can not be filled in. The bottom
border is correctly displayed for received messages, but the edit field has
an additional row of pixels that directly touch the message border on the
bottom.
- When any message is cloned, additional pixels that were masked on the top
screen become visible again in the edit field. This includes the bottom row
of pixels, as well as the two rows of pixels shown in the single line
message picture.
- The drawable area (including obstructed top-left corner) is 228x80 pixels
Observed package counts (no resends) for messages of different sizes:
|draw area|display height|packet#|
|-|-|-|
|top-left pixel of row 1 only|1|13|
|row 1|1|13|
|row 2|2|25|
|row 3|2|25|
|rows 1-2|2|25|
|rows 1-3|3|38|
|rows 4-5|3|38|
|rows 2-3|3|38|
|rows 1-4|4|51|
|rows 1-5|5|64|
|rows 2-5|5|64|
Notable:
- Messages that draw below line 1 while keeping line 1 empty can't be cropped
to utilize line 1 as the username label is in the way. The captured packet
counts suggest that the content of line 1 is still sent (although empty).
- The messages are cropped twice:
* (destructive) *before* sending, as suggested by the packet counts
* (non-destructive or display only) when displayed in the message log on
the top screen
### Message content
![](../assets/pictochat-msg-pattern.png)
![](../assets/ws-msg-pattern.png)
- All messages with interesting content have Ni-Fi header type 1 (CMD).
- PictoChat messages appear to be sent over frames of length 0xf6 (246)
regardless of actual message size.
- All frames appear to be sent exactly 5 times. 'New' frames have a value of
0xe004 at offset 0x0026, while resends have a value of 0xf000 instead.
- There are a lot of messages with length 0xaa (170), these appear to include a
random 32-bit value at offset 0x0046.
- The message content (suspected bitmap-like format) appears to be sent
unencrypted (patterns of 0x0 and 0x1 nibbles clearly visible in hexdump).
- 0x004d - 0x00ec appears to be used to send the actual message content:
![](../assets/pictochat-msg-crop-lork2.png)
![](../assets/ws-msg-fill-top.png)
![](../assets/ws-msg-fill-mid.png)
![](../assets/ws-msg-fill-bot.png)
(excerpts from the start, middle and end frames of a completely filled
message)
- The completely filled message also shows an interesting pattern at the end,
hinting at a slightly odd image codec
- Message length **can not** be used to consistently check which packets
contain PictoChat message data.
#### MAC addresses
The following table of addresses may be visible in the packet captures. An
[ethers](../wireshark/ethers) file is provided in the wireshark folder, which
may be symlinked to `~/.config/wireshark/ethers` to make Wireshark resolve the
MAC addresses to human-readable names.
|address|label|source|
|-|-|-|
|`00:09:bf:11:22:33`|Default firmware MAC|[melonDS/src/SPI\_Firmware.h:37](../melonDS/src/SPI_Firmware.h)|
|`03:09:bf:00:00:00`|Multiplayer CMD|[melonDS/src/Wifi.cpp:42](../melonDS/src/Wifi.cpp)|
|`03:09:bf:00:00:10`|Multiplayer Reply|[melonDS/src/Wifi.cpp:43](../melonDS/src/Wifi.cpp)|
|`03:09:bf:00:00:03`|Multiplayer ACK|[melonDS/src/Wifi.cpp:44](../melonDS/src/Wifi.cpp)|
|`00:f0:77:77:77:77`|Access point|[melonDS/src/WifiAP.cpp:37](../melonDS/src/WifiAP.cpp)|
|`10:00:de:ad:be:ef`|Instance 1 (`lork`) firmware MAC|me|
|`20:00:de:ae:02:ff`|Instance 2 (`lork2`) firmware MAC|me|
|`ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff`|Broadcast||
In melonDS's settings, the firmware MAC addresses for `lork` and `lork2` are
set to `11:00:de:ad:be:ef` and `22:00:de:ad:be:ef` respectively, but these
always get mangled and sent as the addresses noted in the table above. I have
no idea why this happens.
#### Analysis
![](../assets/ws-msg-fill-mid.png)
|offset|type|description|
|-|-|-|
|0x00|`u32`|Ni-Fi: Magic (0x4e494649)|
|0x04|`u32`|Ni-Fi: SenderID (melonDS InstanceID)|
|0x08|`u32`|Ni-Fi: Type|
|0x0c|`u32`|Ni-Fi: Length (after Ni-Fi header)|
|0x10|`u64`|Ni-Fi: Timestamp|
|
|0x18|`u16`|PictoChat: Message type??? (0)|
|0x1a|`u16`|PictoChat: Resend (2=New, 0=Resend)|<!-- I assume u16 because the next byte is always 0x00 -->
|0x22|`u16`|PictoChat: Length (offset 36 of complete packet length)|
|0x28|`u8[6]`|PictoChat: multiplayer CMD MAC (melonDS Wifi::MPCmdMAC)|
|0x2e|`u8[6]`|PictoChat: sender MAC|
|0x34|`u8[6]`|PictoChat: sender MAC (again)|
|0x3a|`u16`|Unknown: counter|
|0x4a|`u16`|PictoChat: Message content offset|
|0x4e|`u8[0xa0]`|PictoChat: Message data (in 8x8 tiles where each byte represents two pixels as nibbles)|
|0xee|`u16`|PictoChat: packet sequence number|
|0xf0|`u16`|PictoChat: copy of 0x1a (Resend)|
|0xf2|`u32`|Unknown: constant 0x93ffb8b6|
<!--
TODO: 0x4e(PictoChat msg data offset) - 0x18(Ni-Fi header length) == 0x36
-->
### Fiddling
After editing melonDS source code to corrupt the local multiplayer message
buffer in known content locations before sending the message to the FIFO
buffer:
![](../assets/pictochat-msg-corrupt-lork.png)
![](../assets/pictochat-msg-corrupt-lork2.png)
This shows a few important details:
- Messages are not limited to the apparent 228x80 size (there is also message
content behind the username label in the above screenshots, but the username
label is on a different graphics layer)
- The ordering of pixels in the messages is not reading order
- Message content is not checked or validated in any way
## Room host
The system that initially joins an empty room appears to become the room host.
This system ends up never sending messages of Ni-Fi type 2 (Reply), while the
packets from other systems after joining an existing room are sent as Ni-Fi
type 2 exclusively.
![](../assets/ws-announce-vs.png)
(Bottom Wireshark window is the room host, top window shows type != 2 Ni-Fi
messages from the system that joined later)
## Unsure/notes
- Is the endianness of the DS properly emulated?
- Is the Ni-Fi magic value also present in physical frames or is this something
MelonDS did?
- The DS implemented WEP(?) encryption for connecting to home network
routers/APs, but is this encryption also used when the WiFi module is used in
local multiplayer mode? Does this even matter inside the emulator?
## TODO:
- message reassembly field? (how does pictochat know which part a message index is)
- are message-resends required or can the packets be dropped?
- user identifier / login / announcement procedure?
- actual message format
* resolution
* pixel ordering
* palette color indices (pixels are 1 nibble)
- what types of pictochat packets are there?
|