From 3c5df23e67a6010fb3ea7214efd1291daef7f2b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: StefanVukovic99 Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 16:48:11 +0200 Subject: remove extra word (#1001) Signed-off-by: StefanVukovic99 --- docs/development/language-features.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/development/language-features.md b/docs/development/language-features.md index 239fab88..9268d4ca 100644 --- a/docs/development/language-features.md +++ b/docs/development/language-features.md @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ However, the only `conditionOut` of this rule, `n`, does not match any `conditio }, ``` -Now the rules will chain together, as shown in the image. Chaining is can be very useful (for agglutinative languages it is indispensable), but may cause unexpected behavior. For example, `boss` will now display results for the word `bo` (e.g. the staff) with the `plural` rule applied twice, i.e. it can chain with itself because the `conditionsIn` and `conditionsOut` are the same. This leads us to the actual implementation of the `plural` rule in `english-transforms.js`: +Now the rules will chain together, as shown in the image. Chaining can be very useful (for agglutinative languages it is indispensable), but may cause unexpected behavior. For example, `boss` will now display results for the word `bo` (e.g. the staff) with the `plural` rule applied twice, i.e. it can chain with itself because the `conditionsIn` and `conditionsOut` are the same. This leads us to the actual implementation of the `plural` rule in `english-transforms.js`: ```js conditions: { -- cgit v1.2.3